IRB Review for Research vs. Assessment
Research studies involving human subjects require IRB review. Assessment/Evaluative studies and activities do not. It is not always easy to distinguish between these two types of projects and projects frequently have elements of both. Therefore, the decision about whether review is required should be made in concert with the IRB and the Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Research is based on a formal testable question or hypothesis that arises from the review of literature on the topic. Data to test the hypothesis or develop new theories is gathered in a systematic and unbiased manner with the purpose of providing generalizable information that can be disseminated in public forums, publications, or other media. Most often it requires extensive time, resources, and expertise. The results can contribute to the general public, a specific discipline, or across disciplines.
Assessment is aimed at the improvement of programs or a process through gathering data about current standards within the system. Assessments take a ‘snap shot’ of the company/institution/program with no intention of generalizing beyond the immediate source of data (e.g., department, university, business). Because the goal of assessment is to describe the organization so improvements can be made there are no control groups or manipulation of variables. The data collected applies only to the place/person/program in which it was collected and the data is not disseminated.
Elements that are common to assessment/evaluation and research projects are listed below; however, the list is not intended to be comprehensive and not all of the elements are required.